Injustice in the name of Justice

Another Rant By: BettyJean Kling

Judge Frederick W. Crow III and King Solomon’s Sword

No one would disagree that judges, by law, should put children’s best interests and safety foremost when they make decisions regarding care and custody.  So why would a judge not care that an Ohio County Public Children Services Agency substantiated child sexual abuse?  Why would any judge order a child into the care and custody of his or her alleged abuser?  And why would a judge punish a protective father or mother by throwing him/her in jail, depriving the child of a safe and loving parent? 

On July 24, 2009 Judge Frederick W. Crow III of the Scioto Count Court of Common Pleas denied Cherish Lewis’ request for a continuance of that day’s hearing, a continuance she desperately needed.  Several days before the hearing, Cherish fired her attorney upon learning he had represented the child’s father, the alleged abuser, in a case of “sexual abuse allegations involving a minor child”.  [see the March 11, 2010 Opinion] Judge Crow ignored Cherish Lewis’ plea to hear witness testimony and review the evidence and report from Scioto County Children’s Services substantiating her child was sexually abused and naming the father as the alleged perpetrator. When Cherish refused to give her daughter into the father’s care that day, Judge Crow ordered her to the Scioto County Jail.   While Cherish’s appeal was pending, her two young children were deprived of their mother for over eight and a half months.

 On March 11, 2010, the Ohio Fourth District Court of Appeals overturned Judge Crow’s decision, stating that Judge Crow “abused his discretion” when he denied Cherish Lewis’ reasonable request for a continuance and that there was “considerable prejudice done to Lewis.”  The Court of Appeals ordered her immediate release from the Scioto County Jail.  Cherish is free and her 5-year-old daughter is safe…but for how long?

 In its March 11, 2010 Opinion, The Fourth District Court of Appeals remanded this case back to Judge Crow’s court for further proceedings “consistent with this opinion.”   Judge Crow has now demanded, on penalty of contempt, that Cherish appear with her daughter at 11 am on Tuesday, March 30th for a status conference.  Based on Judge Crow’s prior abuse of discretion and the case history, we have little reason to hope that he will protect this child or act in her best interest on Tuesday.  On April 10, 2009 the Fourth District Court of Appeals overturned Judge Crow’s order granting the father custody, stating Judge Crow had abused his discretion in determining the best interest of the child.  Will this child’s best interest be honored on Tuesday?                                                     

 We fear that this “status conference” is Judge Crow’s next chance to wield King Solomon’s Sword:  either the child goes with the person she named in a substantiated child sexual abuse report or her mother goes to the Scioto County Jail AGAIN.  This time Cherish may not be able to successfully appeal the order and will be held in jail until she produces her daughter to the father, or in perpetuity. If she ran with her child she would not be able to continue the fight for Justice so she and her children can one day live a normal, happy life, free of abuse or on the run. Now she has attorneys who will present all of the evidence. Will Judge Crow let them?

If you were Cherish Lewis, what would you do?  And if you were that little girl, what would you be hoping for with all your heart?

             There is a simple, rational solution. The mother needs to be able to show up with her daughter as ordered by the court with faith in the system. Faith that Judge Crow will act in the best interest of the child and suspend visitation with the father until ALL evidence and witness testimony of neglect, physical, sexual abuse, as well as prior substance abuse issues of the father have been heard before making a decision to place this child with him and putting her at risk of abused for a third time.  This father has a history. The ONLY thing this mother has ever done is try to protect her child.

Justice For Children – DC

1875 Connecticut Ave NW Ste 710 Washington, DC 20009

202-462-4688 voice ~ 815-301-5516 fax ~ www.justiceforchildren.org

Advertisements

2 Responses

  1. This judge is clearly prejudiced, and should be recused from the case. There should be an investigation into how fatherhood monies coming into the state are allocated, and if this judge has a vested interest or is getting financial rewards for custody switching from a protective mother to a father with an indicated report of child sexual abuse; which is the typical case in which the fraudulent theory of PAS – parental alientation syndrome or the doctrine of it is applied. PAS is the product of a pedophile, incest advocate Dr Richard Gardner as a defense for pedophiles, incest perpetrators, and abusers. Follow the money trail ….bet it leads to the judge’s chambers or bank account!

  2. The people should be calling the state Judicial authority and insisting the judge be removed from the case; and that he is further monitored and perhaps removed from the bench. ALso his past cases should be audited to determine if this is a pattern ….as it likely is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: