Women settle for crumbs at the liberals table as Democrats continue war against women.

BettyJean Downing

VAWA watered down as part of the war against women, Democrats set the table and Republicans drink the kool-ade!
100 Years Ago, women took to the streets and demanded the right to vote. What will you fight for this year? We the women of the free world are the majority, and yet not only are we not covered under the Constitution of the United States, but we ostensibly need a Violence Against Women Act to protect us. Yet with the new act, we are forced to share what little funds we have with Gay men and non-citizens, as well as with any other peoples our government can find to share the already paltry sum amongst!

Still hanging after all these years? Free us now! ERA to free women - we are the niggers of the world!

Still hanging after all these years? Free us now! ERA to free women – we are the niggers of the world!

How disgusting that we, the women of the greatest country on earth, need an act specifically created to address the violence directed against us in the first place. But now, to have to share it with others totally negates the reason we fought for specific protection in the first place.
Is there nothing our government holds sacred for the female majority of the population? Are there not hate crimes in effect for gays? Are there no other recourse acts to be drafted for others in need that we women, who die at the rate of 4 a day, need to share our pitiful sum, stretch our already overtaxed resources to the breaking point, when not even a dent has been made all these years in lowering the staggering numbers of women who suffer and even die from gender related violence?
What was wrong with the Violence Against Women Act before the Democrats decided to alter it and force the Republicans to sign on or risk being held responsible for denying women protection? Once again, women are being used as pawns. And once again, we settle for crumbs at the Liberal table!
Where oh where were the women while this travesty against women was going on? How many of our own daughters must be slain, battered, and raped before we realize that we have once again laid down for the man and his political machine rather than for our own benefit?
CRY for the women who are dying so that the Liberal can continue to allow havoc to be wreaked upon women and blame it on a war coming from someplace else, when it actually comes straight from the liberal table set by the Democrats and their molls!
Shame on the conservative men and women who refused to step up and fight for all women—who refuse to expose this travesty for what it is. Shame on all those who repeatedly sell out women in the name of government!
Give us an Equal Rights Amendment. Free Us Now!

What if Elections Mattered Again?

BettyJean Downing Kling

Those of you who know me since I ran for office in 1990 and 1992 have heard me advocate government reform over and over again. You may have read my “Patriot Plan: Voter Imposed Term Limits” drafted in 1990 in which I explain why we need a third party and have to throw the bums out – all of them. I amusingly call our elected officials two wings of the same vulture.
Today I was made aware of a 5 minute speech that got Judge Napolitano fired from FOX news nearly a year ago. If you are not familiar with the Judge he is a brilliant jurist. More articulate than I, perhaps you will take note as he reveals what I have not been able to clearly convey all these years.
The Judge eloquently and powerfully details explicit facts that demonstrate what we have failed to recognize. If we continue to do what we have been doing – we are going to lose the America our founders gave us. Perhaps we are already too late.
Note: Ron Paul is not the answer but – “We the People” are.
Please listen to and digest this speech, if you believe it has merit – pass it on and perhaps “We the People” will begin to take back our country and stop the madness.

Women’s Issues Ignored: ladies oblivious to the facts!

Survivors Justice begging for attention to women’s plight right here in America  has caused me to rant again: Author asks ” What are we going to do for them???” http://survivorsjustice.com/2012/10/31/what-are-we-going-to-do-for-them/ I responded and am posting my reply as an article- if you agree please let her know suou side with survivors!

Note- this is not about abortion- I am pro-choice for your personal rights! Tthis is about all the other rights that every other woman also has a right to demand and whose choices are not considered as important and whose life , liberty and pursuit of happiness depends on more than reproductive rights! There is more to life then the right to end it- some of us are struggling to live it!

Apparently the war on women has nothing to do with beating them, raping them, abusing them , starving them, or taking away their children to award them to the batterer who wants to avoid child support and alimony. It has everything to do with dividing women into two political groups; those who want children and those who want the right not to have them! In the process the majority is split into minorities without enough power to affect change for womankind but enough power to sway elections. We are being USED ladies and abused. WAKE UP!If you ask me – ignoring all the things that we really need- like the litany of problems I mentioned above and jobs, education, the debt, war, economy: price of food and utilities etc. etc. is the war on women.IGNORING all of US- is the war!

When is the last time you needed an abortion more than food, safety for yourself and your children , a place to live, a job, your batterer jailed for his crime, or a court to listen objectively before turning our children over to the pedophiles or batterers who abused them?

But what do we know – we are beaten, battered, stupid breeders who apparently don’t need equal rights, just a lot of rhetoric that reproductive rights makes us the most powerful beings on earth because we hold the power of life and death.

What a load of shit- we are being murdered at the rate of 4 a day by our intimate partners. We are beaten by those we love and trust every 9 seconds – we are raped every 9 minutes and they tell us all we want is to abort a possible pregnancy?

Gimme a break – I want the right to castrate the bastard who raped me and any other son of a bitch who rapes my child. I want these batterers locked away! I want pedophiles castrated and put on an island. I don’t give a rat’s ass about their civil rights.

I care about the civil rights of the majority – which in case you have not noticed – WE DO NOT HAVE! What we have is the right to abort and nothing more! I care about the rights of innocent children who have no voice and are victimized by adults, the courts, pedophiles and would be mothers who take their rage out on the child instead of the perpetrator.

Obama must go! Stevens et al were left to die!

Criticism: Pat Smith, whose diplomat son Sean,died in the raid, slammed the President's remarks on Comedy Central regarding her son's death.

Criticism: Pat Smith, whose diplomat son Sean,died in the raid, slammed the President’s remarks on Comedy Central regarding her son’s death.

BettyJean Downing

Excerpts:

Across 166 pages of internal State Department documents — released Friday on the Benghazi terrorist attack — slain U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and the security officers assigned to protect him repeatedly sounded alarms to their superiors in Washington about the intensifying lawlessness and violence in Eastern Libya, where Stevens ultimately died.

On Sept. 11 — the day Stevens and three other Americans were killed — the ambassador signed a three-page cable, labeled “sensitive,” in which he noted “growing problems with security” in Benghazi and “growing frustration” on the part of local residents with Libyan police and security forces. These forces the ambassador characterized as “too weak to keep the country secure.”

Roughly a month earlier, Stevens had signed a two-page cable, also labeled “sensitive,” that he entitled “The Guns of August: Security in Eastern Libya.”

Writing on Aug. 8, the ambassador noted that in just a few months’ time, “Benghazi has moved from trepidation to euphoria and back as a series of violent incidents has dominated the political landscape.” He added, “The individual incidents have been organized,” a function of “the security vacuum that a diverse group of independent actors are exploiting for their own purposes.”

“Islamist extremists are able to attack the Red Cross with relative impunity,” Stevens cabled. “What we have seen are not random crimes of opportunity, but rather targeted and discriminate attacks.” His final comment on the two-page document was: “Attackers are unlikely to be deterred until authorities are at least as capable.”

By Sept. 4, Stevens’ aides were reporting back to Washington on the “strong Revolutionary and Islamist sentiment” in the city.

In the days leading up to Sept. 11, warnings came even from people outside the State Department. A Libyan women’s rights activist, Wafa Bugaighis, confided to the Americans in Benghazi in mid-August: “For the first time since the revolution, I am scared.”

The documents were released by two lawmakers who have been active in probing the Benghazi case, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah. In a letter to President Obama, dated Oct. 19 and accompanied by the documents, the lawmakers faulted the administration both for providing inadequate security before Sept. 11, and for allegedly obfuscating the nature of the events on Sept. 11.

“Multiple warnings about security threats were contained in Ambassador Stevens’ own words in multiple cables sent to Washington, D.C., and were manifested by two prior bombings of the Benghazi compound and an assassination attempt on the British ambassador,” the congressmen wrote. “For this administration to assume that terrorists were not involved in the 9/11 anniversary attack would have required a willing suspension of disbelief.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/19/documents-show-stevens-worried-about-libya-security-threats-al-qaeda-before/#ixzz29mbdAfHc

Benghazi-Gate: Obama’s failure to protect those who serve and the resulting cover-up

BettyJean

On Libya, the left is not discussing the important part of the discussion- why? This terrorist attack had nothing to do with a video that has been out since June- it was all about 911 and this administration is selling the nation a spin that is intolerable.

The consulate was under manned. The Ambassador was unprotected or under protected. – CNN has found a journal that proves Ambassador Stevens was concerned for his safety.

It ends up that on 911- the Ambassador, two Navy Seal and an assistant – all four were raped- tortured and dragged through the streets for 7 hours then tossed into a burning building where they were found then retrieved by YES Libyans. Unfortunately, It was too too late Christopher Stevens died of smoke inhalation at or on the way to the hospital.

Change we can believe in?My dear citizens– not only did our commander and chief go to Las Vegas within hours, but followed the perfunctory remarks up with the line – “there is an election going on”!

The administration including my beloved Hillary spun the line that it was a “spontaneous protest” for days on end, in my opinion, because Obama did not and would not cease to campaign. For days, those who apparently blindly support him have conveniently decided to give him a pass and talk about the positive side of this horrendous attack on our property, the destroying of our flag and the murder of our citizens. On 9/11

Ironically, other protests occurring all over the Muslim world resulting in flag burning and large crowds burning effigy’s of Obama also appear to be connected to 911 but  did not result in death because  weapons were not present. This 13 minute trailor has conveniently been blamed for all the protests although Bengazi was obviously a planned terrorist attack as none of the others came with weapons and a murder plan for 2 unprotected buildings.  Moreover, not word has been uttered from the free speech advocates about the perp walk the brute movie maker was taken on to appease the radical Muslims and help seal the spin regarding the true purpose of this murderous attack.

Please Democrats – you have been hurling accusations at me since 9/12. I am trying hard to understand because my heart is broken over this and yours should be also. You who are always protesting against the murder of innocence and demanding justice. Where are you now?  You say you are saddened- I am sure you are but they were not your family- put yourself in their shoes. Do you have someone out there fighting for you and left unprotected while this guy is oblivious?

I lost 3 of my children- The one I have left had her brains blown out by a gunman four years ago, and her son has been helping me carry her from the wheelchair to the bed to change her diapers daily and feed her through a G-tube. He gave up college to do this while his friends graduated and became professional. Now he wants to join the Marines and of course I was behind him all the way- we are a very patriotic family – my dad a highly decorated WWll war hero.

I live in NJ within site of the towers and I know folks who died on 911/11. We suffer ever year on the anniversary- we look and wait for the next attack. Low planes scare us 365 days a year! We are vigilant!

Is there any doubt this is terrorism? Would any decent man be campaigning- or would he be viewing these films as I was instead? On 9/12/12- I was shocked to see we were attacked again. Within 24 hours I saw video’s of the Ambassador having been beaten and dragged through the streets, yet 3 days later – the administration was out still saying they had no idea what was happening. If I knew – they should have known. How inept can they be? Or are they just liars?

Once I saw POTUS on 9/12 and 9/13 campaigning away while these bodies was not yet cold- I told my grandson – He serves under this man over my dead body! A president that cannot stop campaigning over the brutal murders of 4 of our finest no matter what the reason does not deserve all I have left and for the first time in my adult life – ‘I AM NOT PROUD OF MY COUNTRY’.

This is not a partisan argument- this is not a racist issue- this is my patriotic duty!  I love Hillary yet thrice I have totally abhorred her actions, this is the third time and this one is unforgivable! I can no longer give her a pass. When our service people sign up – they trust that if they give their all and risk their lives – we will have their back. The administration did not have the back of these 4 and lied about it to boot!

Please do not obfuscate the issue with questions about Bush or any other administration- if one of these was your son or brother – what would that matter? It is this issue I am discussing right now and what needs to be done right now.  This administration needs fired and there is an election next month.  Voters need to know Obama nor his administration are fit to lead or accept responsibility for their mistakes and on top of it all – they are lying thru their teeth for political gain.

I will leave you to your conscience as to what to do – I suggest you deal with reality for one thing (like they knew the truth within 24 hours — as soon as I did or sooner– and yet they decided to spin it) and then consider the right thing to do. We are American first – these folks put their lives on the line for you and I – we owe them something. If you do not agree – I must question your allegiance.  No administration comes before my country and next comes those who risk their lives to keep us free.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9iz4RIh3ws

Medicare is and was a bipartisan effort

BettyJean Downing Kling

Time to cut through the BS- before you vote learn the facts about these two parties. Don’t believe the drivel learn the facts. For example, yesterday I told you the truth about the women’s programs and showed you proof positive where much of the women’s rights since the 70’s came from: Title IX, Title X, ERA, Equal Pay, PP & Abortion, came from the Republican administration! Today The Majority United will enlighten women and seniors about Medicare! We will show you that these social programs are not a gift solely from kind hearted Dems or in danger of Republican cold hearted killers!

Although the overall politics of Medicare and Medicaid were liberal ideal in 1965, the help of John Byrnes, a Republican, was essential in drafting what became United States’ first public health insurance program. While President Lyndon B. Johnson was responsible for signing the bill, there were many others involved in drafting the final bill that was introduced to the United States Congress in March 1965.

A little history shows us the Democrats were not the only ones willing to support social programs especially if they might harm their reelection.

For example,

In 1935, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt,, a Democrat, signed the Social Security Act, medical benefits were left out of the bill. While Roosevelt wished to include some sort of national health care provisions in the bill, he believed the American population would not be ready and the idea would be unpopular. Hmmmm?

Harry Truman, a Democrat, took on the idea of national medical care and tried to integrate it into his Fair Deal program. Truman’s attempts were also unsuccessful, though during his presidency the fight for national medical care became specific to the aged population. Once the targeted age was decided, a lengthy debate began over presenting a coherent medical care bill to Congress.

During the Eisenhower administration, the House Ways and Means Committee was created. The members of this committee were mainly Republicans and Southern Democrats, complicating attempts to pass social health programs. Wilbur Mills, a Republican and chair of the committee, later played a role in creating the health care program that was integrated into the Social Security Act.

Wilbur Cohen was known by several nicknames. He was once dubbed “The Man Who Built Medicare” and John F. Kennedy tagged him “Mr. Social Security,” although, it was Frances Perkins, the first woman Secretary of Labor (under FDR) who was the architect of social security. With The Social Security Act Perkins established unemployment benefits, pensions for the many uncovered elderly Americans, and welfare for the poorest Americans. The New York Times called him “one of the country’s foremost technicians in public welfare.” Time portrayed him as a man of “boundless energy, infectious enthusiasm, and a drive for action.” He was a leading expert on Social Security and a member of Americans for Democratic Action.

When deliberations began in 1965, both AMA members and their suggestions were rejected. Wilbur Mills, the chair of the Ways and Means committee, suggested combining Byrnes’ ideas and Medicare. His committee took on the task of drafting the bill that ultimately became law. In combining the two bills, John Byrnes’ suggestion, which included lower taxes, had to be altered as higher taxes were necessary for the program’s predicted costs.

In March 1965, Mills presented a draft of the bill to Congress. The bill went through more than five hundred amendments before being passed by majority vote in both the House (307-116) and Senate (70-24).[citation needed] The legislation made two amendments to the Social Security Act of 1935. Title XVIII, which became known as Medicare, includes Part A, which provides hospital insurance for the aged, and Part B, which provides supplementary medical insurance. Title XIX, which became known as Medicaid, provides for the states to finance health care for individuals who were at or close to the public assistance level with federal matching funds.

On July 30, 1965, President Johnson, a Democrat, signed the bill, making it Public Law 89-97. The signing took place in Independence, Missouri and was attended by Harry S. Truman. Johnson credited Truman with “planting the seeds of compassion and duty which have today flowered into care for the sick and serenity for the fearful.” Implementation of the amendments required extensive data processing and the re-configuration of hospital policies nationwide.

On December 8, 2003, President Bush (Jr.) signed Public Law 108-173, The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (also called the Medicare Modernization Act or MMA) is a federal law of the United States, enacted in 2003. It produced the largest overhaul of Medicare in the public health program’s 38-year history. The MMA was signed by President George W. Bush on December 8, 2003, after passing in Congress by a close margin.

In the years since Medicare’s creation in 1965, the role of prescription drugs in U.S. patient care has significantly increased. As new and expensive drugs have come into use, patients, particularly senior citizens for whom Medicare was designed, have found prescriptions harder to afford. The MMA is meant to address this problem.

To learn more about Public Law 108-173, The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act MMA: http://www.medicare.gov/medicarereform/108s1013.htm

Year of the Woman, not Title IX, and more than tits and ass!

BettyJean Downing Kling

Women triumphed at the Olympics this year by working hard and the ladies teams won by working together! Imagine how much more can be won so much more than a few crotchety items! A few less battered bodies, dead women, raped children, safer streets and schools perhaps? Look at the bigger picture- Imagine the Majority United?

Every country represented at the Olympics also brought women, please try to remember that all women count regardless of their ideology.  Interestingly – there is no Title IX in China or in Russia or in Romania but they send plenty of women and they have been winning since the very beginning because they train them well regardless of women’s lib. For Left leaning—err Democrat, moles disguised as national women’s groups to hail to the chief pushing Liberal politics as the reason for our women  winning this year flies in the face of all the countries who have sent women and who support them financially as well. Our Government doesn’t financially support our female athletes, so title 9 is less valuable compared to the full support even Commy nations give their women – so let’s get off of the right left crap about it! I am grateful T9 let gave females opportunities but stop exploiting everything for the Party’s sake and start working instead for all women. Geeze don’t we ever get tired of being party first — instead of all women come before either party?

Forget the politics and unite women behind an idea, that idea being that all women in the US are valuable regardless of left or right divisive issues that separate them. Bring FEMALES together rather than let the ‘all boys clubs’ – both of them pull us apart.

Stop with the right left division and let’s get the majority united. Try this for a change — appeal to women without alluding to party- right or left or their friggen vaginas or reproduction. Try appealing to the fact that 4 a day are beaten to death – or otherwise murdered t the hand of an intimate partner and we need stricter and enforceable laws. Let’s appeal to women who need our support in divorce and family courts- those who have their children stripped from their loving arms and placed in the care of their abusers or worse pedophiles. Let’s appeal to the indecency women face in our court systems and the plight of the poor in education and leave the birth control to another day. How about we appeal to life and our children and stopping the death of children and their mother’s lives for a change, more women and children face those needs on a daily basis. Can we speak up for safer streets, and food, and schools and jobs for just a few weeks here? Appeal to the fact that we need to make this a safer place for our daughters, a more equal playing field. Can you concentrate on that for just a few months- just long enough to get this bill passed or must you turn off half the women in this country to satisfy the other half?  Are thou really going to cut the baby in half over and over and over again?  What about the battered women- what about the mothers- what about the lost children? Does anyone else count anymore? Look at the bigger picture- Imagine the Majority United?

For those of you who get it and are willing to use a softer approach try this letter and send it to both R’s and D’s.

Good Luck and Thanks you so much for your common sense!

“I am calling today to ask that (Senator/Representative) ________________ give his/her support to resolutions moving through the House and Senate that call for the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment, Many organizations have been working on this since it was first introduced in the 1920’s by suffragist Alice Paul. I feel that the Equal Rights Amendment is important issue in this coming election and is bi-partisan.

There is no excuse for it not to be enacted in my lifetime. I want to see Equal Rights for Women specifically spelled out in The Constitution. Women comprise 52% of the electorate and in return for our votes this November we are asking for your immediate support on: H.J.Res.47: and S.J.Res.39:

No longer pacified by promises, we require a true demonstration of value for value. In return for votes from our large voting bloc we demand equal rights under The Constitution.

I hope I can count on (Senator/Representative) ___________’s support on this issue.

Thank you.”

H.J.Res.47: Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment. (aka: The Three State Solution)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.J.RES.47:

S.J.Res.39: A joint resolution removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.J.RES.39:

The Text:

JOINT RESOLUTION

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding any time limit contained in House Joint Resolution 208 of the Ninety-second Congress, second session, the article of amendment proposed to the States in that joint resolution shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution whenever ratified by three additional States.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,378 other followers